Legal Opinion

Pauling v. Pauling

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1992No. 91-248PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant D. Michael Pauling (the father) appeals from the lower court’s order modifying his child support obligation.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The father offers the following issues on appeal:

I. Wyoming Statute § 20-6-306(a) is both unconstitutional and prejudicial as applied to Appellant’s case.

II. The lower court’s modification order requiring the Appellant to continue child support payments until minor child reached age of 21 was error.

III. The Appellant’s obligation to pay excess medical expenses should be modified to permit Appellant to insure against…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mentock v. MentockWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Phillips v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In Re Estate of HerefordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Manners v. MannersWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Cranston v. CranstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rutti v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jones v. JonesWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Triggs v. TriggsWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Tyler R. Kimzey v. Shelby K. KimzeyWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API