Bellamy v. Bellamy
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Seneca Cornell, Judge. Action to construe a will. Opinion states the facts. Decree in the court below is against the construction placed on the will by the intervenor. Intervenor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
This action is brought by the administrators of the estate of Harvey W. Almack, for leave to sell certain real estate for the purpose of paying debts, and for a division of what remains of the proceeds, according to the terms of the will of the said Harvey W. Almack. S. A. *1194Corey intervened, claiming to be a creditor of one of tbe devisees in the will, to wit, Ethel Jones, and alleged that the said Ethel Jones, under the terms of the will, is entitled to an undivided one eighth of an undivided two thirds of the real estate. After the intervention was filed, it was stipulated that the rights of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Law v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Bills v. BillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Canaday v. BaysingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Luckey v. McCraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- In re Will of BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Iowa City State Bank v. PritchardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- McCulloch's Estate v. ConradSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Todd v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Moore v. McKinleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Catlin v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.