Legal Opinion

Kepley v. Zachry

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1938No. 2158—7076PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GERMAN, Commissioner.

The opinion in this case is reported in 116 S.W.2d 699. After a careful consideration of the opinion, we have concluded that the following language contained therein may be withdrawn:

First. “The Constitution and the statute clearly make room for two kinds of contract: First, a contract, at a stipulated sum, for an improvement, or improvements, the nature and' extent of which are disclosed with reasonable certainty by the contract and/or the plans and specifications, made a part of same. Second, for labor and materials used in the construction of an improvement, in which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lyon v. OzeeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Kepley v. ZachryTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Walker v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Minnehoma Financial Co. v. DittoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  2. Jeter v. Seminole State National Bank (In Re Jeter)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
  3. Graves v. HallmarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API