Williams v. Jay
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
We are of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. The right-of Williams to have the verdict in this ease set aside depended either upon his having a lien by virtue of the transfer of the account for material furnished by Marbut-Williams Lumber Co. to J. I. Hembree, or having in effect an equitable mortgage. Clearly the Mar-but-Williams Lumber Co. had no enforceable lien, as they had not pursued the statute which would give them a lien or the right to enforce it. This is conceded in tire case; and as that companjq the assignor of the account, had no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. BrewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Hood Brick Co. v. ManghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Hooper v. SellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shubert v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- King v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Christian v. BremerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Pembroke State Bank v. Balboa InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Averitt v. Swainsboro Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940