Legal Opinion

Williams v. Jay

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 17, 1931No. Nos. 8025, 8026PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

We are of the opinion that the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. The right-of Williams to have the verdict in this ease set aside depended either upon his having a lien by virtue of the transfer of the account for material furnished by Marbut-Williams Lumber Co. to J. I. Hembree, or having in effect an equitable mortgage. Clearly the Mar-but-Williams Lumber Co. had no enforceable lien, as they had not pursued the statute which would give them a lien or the right to enforce it. This is conceded in tire case; and as that companjq the assignor of the account, had no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. BrewtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  2. Hood Brick Co. v. ManghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Hooper v. SellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shubert v. SpeirSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. King v. RutledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Christian v. BremerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Pembroke State Bank v. Balboa InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Averitt v. Swainsboro Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API