Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

United States v. Jeffrey D. Sayre

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2005No. 04-1330Published

1Concurring in the judgmentGruender, Circuit Judge

I concur in the judgment of the Court because I agree that Sayre’s sentence should be affirmed. I write separately, however, because I believe that Sayre’s challenge to the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines deserves only plain-error review.

The district court found that Sayre’s conduct in planning to murder a witness was an aggravating circumstance present to a degree not adequately taken into consideration by the Sentencing Commission and imposed a 4-level upward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0. That upward departure raised Sayre’s sentencing range from to 27-33 months to 41-51…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. Johnny Franklin, Jr., Also Known as Jack CulpepperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Shelbourne SelwynCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API