Legal Opinion

Feigin v. Securities America, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1999No. 98CA0718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CRISWELL.

Applicants for intervention, Charles and Patricia Patterson and Edward and Tamera Seevers (investors), appeal from the order denying their motion to intervene in the civil enforcement action filed by plaintiff, Philip A. Feigin, as Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado (the Commissioner), against defendants, Alexa Group, Ltd., James P. Dufficy, Eva F. Balassa, and Securities America, Inc. (SAI). We vacate the order denying intervenors’ motion and remand with *677directions to permit intervention. We also vacate, pending consideration of investors’ objections…

2Cases cited17 opinions

Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
Sierra Club v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
Scotty Grubbs, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Proposed Intervenor/appellant v. Stephen H. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
Ceres Gulf and Esis/ina v. Cleaster Cooper, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (u.s. Department of Labor), Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Feigin v. Alexa Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001