Legal Opinion

Russell v. . Freer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1874PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The counsel for the appellants insists that the referee erred in refusing to find the fact that Abner Hasbrouck signed the bond upon the condition that it should thereafter be signed by James Dolson. If the evidence conclusively proved this fact, and its finding in connection with the other facts found would constitute any defence to the action, the point is well taken. Hasbrouck and Freer, both defendants in the action, to whose benefit the testimony would inure, gave evidence tending to prove this fact. Several other persons present at the time and participating more or less in the business…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chouteau v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. The People v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Benton County Savings Bank of Norway v. BoddickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  2. Whitford v. . LaidlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Comstock v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Naylor v. SteneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API