Legal Opinion

Kardashian v. Akashi

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 6, 1963No. Civ. No. 27319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

JThis is an appeal from an order refusing to confirm the sale of real property by the executrix of the above entitled estate.

Respondents entered into an agreement with the heirs of the estate, as evidenced by escrow instructions signed July 13, 1962, whereby respondents agreed to buy and the heirs agreed to sell certain real property in the estate for the sum of $8,000 cash, conveyance to be made, “at such time as the said estate probate is completed.” Subsequently, a notice of sale of the same real property was published by appellant (executrix), who is also one of the heirs. Offers were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rawitzer v. First Trust Co. of OmahaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Mercantile Trust Co. v. NewloveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Estate of StewardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  4. Estate of WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of HarabedianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Florence Palting Hair Priscilla Palting Ragland Portia Palting Seely Jeannie Palting Wimett Estate of Mildred Palting v. Marciano v. PangilinanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API