Legal Opinion

Pinal County v. Hammons

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1926No. Civil No. 2443PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

In the year 1923 the county assessor of the plaintiff county carried an account in his official capacity with the Pinal Bank & Trust Company, a banking institution doing a general banking business at Florence, the county seat of said county. On the eleventh day of May of that year, the bank, being insolvent, was taken over with all its assets and property by the defendant, A. T. Hammons, superintendent of banks. At the time there was deposited to the credit of the assessor, as such, the sum of $6,752.81, of which $5,421.73 represented personal property taxes collected by said assessor during…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Janin v. London & San Francisco BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Fidelity State Bank v. North Fork Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Central Bank v. LowdermilkArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State v. BruceIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Williams v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Jarvis v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  4. City of Bisbee v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Skaggs Drug Center, Inc. v. United States Time Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API