Legal Opinion

People v. Cummings

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 10,524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of Tuba County. Bliss, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Sharpstein, J.:

The evidence in this case tends to prove that the defendant, about the 1st of October, 1878, went to one Asa Eisk, at San Francisco, and asked him to advance $300 to pay the balance due on a purchase of ten tons of broom-corn, by the defendant, of Hong Po & Co. of Marysville, as evidenced by their bill of sale to him. Fisk declined to advance the sum applied for, without an absolute transfer of the property to him by the defendant; and thereupon he signed a certificate on the back of *89the bill of sale of the broom-corn from Hong Po & Co. to him, to the effect that he had sold…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Scoville v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. OreileusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Mendenhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  5. People v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API