People v. Cummings
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and an order denying a new trial, in the County Court of Tuba County. Bliss, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Sharpstein, J.:
The evidence in this case tends to prove that the defendant, about the 1st of October, 1878, went to one Asa Eisk, at San Francisco, and asked him to advance $300 to pay the balance due on a purchase of ten tons of broom-corn, by the defendant, of Hong Po & Co. of Marysville, as evidenced by their bill of sale to him. Fisk declined to advance the sum applied for, without an absolute transfer of the property to him by the defendant; and thereupon he signed a certificate on the back of *89the bill of sale of the broom-corn from Hong Po & Co. to him, to the effect that he had sold…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Pye v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Scoville v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. OreileusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mendenhall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- People v. CraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906