Legal Opinion
Bencoe v. McDonnell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 16, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kapper, JJ., concur.
The following is the opinion of the court below:
Taylor, J.:
An accounting before the referee, by the defendants, has been directed in the interlocutory decree. The account has been filed; in effect it constitutes a pleading by the defendants as to the state of the account. The plaintiff has not as yet filed objections thereto; in other words, issue has not been joined as to the same. He now applies for a very general inspection of records, books and documents of the defendants, pertaining to plaintiff’s past transactions with them.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. KeenanNew York Supreme Court · 1917
- Hay v. Republic Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Rheims v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Seligsberg v. ScheppAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colonial Trust Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Evans v. Evans, JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of SmathersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- Royce v. ZiegfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Munsie v. Highland HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.