Legal Opinion · Dissent

First National Bank of Mobile v. Pope

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 7, 1963No. 1 Div. 944, 945, 946Published

1DissentLawson, Justice

I am constrained to dissent because I am convinced that we erred in our opinion on former appeal and that the court in this case is perpetuating that error.

The complainant and cross complainants base their right to relief on the principle that:

“Whenever the legal title to proper^ ty, real or personal, has been obtained through actual fraud, misrepresenta.tion, concealment, or through undue influence, duress, taking advantage of one’s weakness or necessities, or through any other similar means or ■under any other similar circumstances which render it unconscientious for the holder of the legal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Kent v. DeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  5. Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. McKnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API