Legal Opinion

Fulani v. Krivanek

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 5, 1992No. 91-3918PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

In this ballot-access case, plaintiffs New Alliance Party (“NAP”) and Lenora B. Fulani (“Fulani”) appeal from the district court’s ruling in favor of defendants State of Florida and Hillsborough County Supervisor of Elections Robin Krivanek (“Kriva-nek”). The district court held that Fla. Stat. § 99.097(4), which excludes minor political parties from a provision allowing candidates qualifying by petition to waive unduly burdensome signature-verification fees, does not violate the Equal Protection Clause or the First Amendment. We reverse.

*1540BACKGROUND

Fulani was the NAP’s…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Duke v. ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Duke v. ClelandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Belitskus v. PizzingrilliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Erard v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API