Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Citizens Street Railroad v. Shepherd

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1901No. 3,245Published

From Hamilton Circuit Court; J. F. Neal, Judge. Action by Lillie M. Shepherd against the Citizens Street Railroad Company for damages for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion.

Roby, J.

Hnder the decisions of the Supreme Court, I think that the legality of the order granting a change of venue is not presented, it not having been assigned as a reason for a new trial. Walker v. Heller, 73 Ind. 46; Caldwell v. Board, etc., 80 Ind. 99; Wilson v. Johnson, 145 Ind. 40; Sidener v. Davis, 87 Ind. 342; Bane v. Ward, 77 Ind. 153; Horton v. Wilson, 25 Ind. 316; Knarr v. Conaway, 53 Ind. 120; Berlin v. Oglesbee, 65 Ind. 308; Shoemaker v. Smith, 74 Ind. 71; Jones v. Rittenhouse, 87 Ind. 348; Scanlin v. Stewart, 138 Ind. 574; Wiley v. Barclay, 58 Ind. 577;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Berlin v. OglesbeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API