Legal Opinion

Chase v. Baskerville

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1904No. Nos. 14,074—(98)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Simpson, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action for the conversion of an automobile, claimed to have been the property of plaintiff, but wrongfully appropriated in opposition to his rights. The conversion was disputed, and the cause tried to the court and a jury. At the close of the evidence a verdict was directed for defendants. There was a motion for a new trial upon the evidence, which was refused. From this order plaintiff appeals.

*403The testimony tended to show that the automobile was shipped from Minneapolis, with several others, by the plaintiff, who was the manufacturer, to the State Bank of Watertown, South Dakota, with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. BayhaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheldon-Mather Timber Co. v. Itasca Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API