Legal Opinion

Azima v. Rak Investment Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 7, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2016-1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) FARHAD AZIMA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 16-cv-1948 (KBJ) ) RAK INVESTMENT AUTHORITY ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 30, 2018, this Court issued an opinion denying the motion to dismiss that Defendant RAK Investment Authority (“RAKIA”) had filed in the instant matter— a case that involves claims by Plaintiff Farhad Azima that RAKIA “commissioned the repeated surreptitious hacking of his personal and business laptops from October 2015 to August 2016, and then published disparaging material that was illicitly gleaned…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Samantar v. YousufSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Singh v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Hassan El-Fadl v. Central Bank of JordanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API