Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 7, 1976No. 45560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Chief Justice.

Appeal by Rauenhorst Corporation and Thomas MacMillan from a judgment which granted indemnity to Yellow Cab Company and Phil Flom on their cross-claim in an action brought by William and Nancy Carlson in which both Yellow Cab’s driver, Flom, and Rauenhorst’s driver, MacMillan, were found negligent.

The facts of this case are identical to those in Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis v. MacMillan, 284 Minn. 531, 169 N. W. 2d 8 (1969). As the result of a multiple-car accident in 1966, Yellow Taxi (now Yellow Cab) sued Rauenhorst and its driver, MacMillan, for property damage to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  2. Shimp Ex Rel. Shimp v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Radmacher v. CardinalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Yellow Taxi Co. of Minneapolis v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Abraham Ex Rel. Abraham v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trapp v. R-Vec Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Koski v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API