Legal Opinion
Hauschild v. United States Marshals Service
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 6, 2016No. 15-2927-cvPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Daniel F. Hauschild appeals from a judgment of the district court entered August 31, 2015 in favor of defendants-appellees the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) and Patricia Hoffman, dismissing his claims under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 702, 706(2)(A), (B).1 The district court explained its reasoning in a decision and order entered August 28, 2015. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts, the procedural history of the case, and the issues on appeal.
Hauschild was employed by Akal Security, Inc. (“Akal”), a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hayden v. PatersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Up State Federal Credit Union, 1916 Black River Blvd., Rome, Ny v. Robert M. Walker, as Acting Secretary of the Army of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- County of Westchester v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Atterbury v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
3Cited by1 opinion
- Atterbury v. United States Marshals ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019