Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Frost & Bartlett Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
In December, 1915, the Davey Tree Expert Company filed a bill against the Erost & Bartlett Company and Erancis A. Bartlett and Martin Davis, individually, to enjoin the infringement of letters patent No. 958,478, covering a process of sectional fillings in tree surgery, and to obtain an accounting of profits and damages derived from such infringement. Subsequent to the filing of this bill, the Davey patent was held valid in Davey Tree Expert Co. v. Easton (D. C.) 283 Fed. 840. Thereafter, on April 13, 1920, an interlocutory decree was entered by consent of the parties,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelley v. MilanSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. Haber Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Hodgson v. VroomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Kelly v. Town of MilanUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- Forncrook v. RootSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Wrigley, Jr. Co. v. L. P. Larson, Jr. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1925
- The Ansaldo San Giorgio ICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Hite v. Queen's HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
- Rheinstrom Bros. v. Societa Nazionale Di NavigazioneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934