Ex parte Storm

OPINION

GARDNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The trial court denied Appellant’s pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged that the State was barred by double jeopardy from prosecuting him for possession of diazepam, a controlled substance, because evidence regarding Appellant’s possession of diazep-am was admitted at his previous trial for possession of amphetamine. We affirm.

II. Factual Background

On April 27, 1999, Appellant was tried and convicted for the felony offense of *402possession of amphetamine, a controlled substance. The indictment solely charged Appellant with…