Meldahl v. Holberg
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.
Plaintiffs, for themselves and others, seek to restrain the defendant from repairing and altering a building situated on lot 6 im block 30 of the original plat of Valley City so as to establish what is known as a “Funeral Home.” Plaintiffs claim that such acts will result in the establishment of a nuisance as to them and will be “am unwarrantable invasion of the property rights of the residents in that vicinity.”
The complaint does not claim that there is any danger of contagion) or that noxious gases or such like nuisance will arise. The contention is that this “Funeral Home” is being…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- People v. Detroit White Lead Works Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. Luquire Funeral HomeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Arthur v. VirklerNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Dawson v. LaufersweilerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Frederick v. Brown Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Johnson v. DrysdaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.