Legal Opinion

Matter of Mark T.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1982No. 616PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in finding her minor son “dependent” as defined in the Juvenile Act.1 We agree and, accordingly, vacate the orders of the lower court and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Mark, the subject of this appeal, was born to appellant and her husband, on May 19, 1972. Following his parent’s divorce, Mark remained in the custody of appellant in Pennsylvania, while his father settled in Florida. After a pattern of unexcused absences from school, the Clinton County Children and Youth Social Services Agency (CYS) filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Interest of LaRueSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. In the Interest of BlackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. In the Interest of PernishekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. In Interest of Theresa E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. In re A. E. M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In the Interest of Michael Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In Re Adoption of Michael J.C.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. In Interest of Anita H.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. In re J.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. In the Interest of A.E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API