Hidalgo v. Purcell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.
Petitioner appeals from denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. He had been con victed of crime in California and placed on parole. A term of Ms parole was violated when, without permission, he moved to Oregon. California sought extradition from the Governor of Oregon, which was granted. In his petition for habeas corpus, seeking to prevent extradition, petitioner contends that he is not “charged with a crime,” and therefore he may not be extradited.
United States Constitution, Art IV, § 2, provides that
“A Person charged * * * with * * * Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- State Ex Rel. Westlund v. NehlsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. PerrymanMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Hood v. PurcellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. TallyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Betschart v. SpindenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BeirleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980