Legal Opinion

People v. Perryman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1989No. Docket 83651PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case requires that we determine the meaning of the following emphasized language contained in MCL 750.199a; MSA 28.396(1):

Any person who shall abscond on or forfeit a bond given in any criminal proceedings wherein a felony is charged shall be deemed guilty of a felony.

The specific question is whether the statute may be applied to a defendant who has been convicted of a felony and released on bond pending delayed sentencing. We hold that it may.

i

Defendant was convicted in a prior proceeding of larceny over $100, 1 and of being an habitual offender, fourth offense. 2 The trial judge agreed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Anderson v. CorallSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. People v. McKinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. City of Holland v. Consumers Energy CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Bloomfield Township v. KaneMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. DemersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. City of Holland v. Consumers Energy CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API