Smiley v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
In this appeal we clarify when a judge may preclude a witness from testifying because that witness violated the court's separation of witnesses order. Appellant-defendant Michael Smiley contests his two convictions for Conspiracy to Commit Robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, 1 both Class B felonies, and his two convictions for Conspiracy to Commit Burglary, 2 both Class B felonies. Specifically, he claims that the trial court erred in not allowing a defense witness to testify because she had violated the court's separation of witnesses order.
FACTS
The State charged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brannum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Rinard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Nordstrom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Stafford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Corley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Vinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.