Legal Opinion

Smiley v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1995No. 41A01-9402-CR-46PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

In this appeal we clarify when a judge may preclude a witness from testifying because that witness violated the court's separation of witnesses order. Appellant-defendant Michael Smiley contests his two convictions for Conspiracy to Commit Robbery while armed with a deadly weapon, 1 both Class B felonies, and his two convictions for Conspiracy to Commit Burglary, 2 both Class B felonies. Specifically, he claims that the trial court erred in not allowing a defense witness to testify because she had violated the court's separation of witnesses order.

FACTS

The State charged…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brannum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Rinard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Nordstrom v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Stafford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Corley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Griffin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Vinson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API