Legal Opinion

Nordstrom v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1994No. 75A05-9209-CR-336PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

After trial by jury Donald E. Nordstrom was convicted of Reckless Homicide, a Class C felony 1 , for which he received an eight-year sentence. He now appeals raising three issues for our review which we rephrase as follows:

1) Did the trial court's jury instruction on the defense of mistake of fact require reversal?

2) Did Nordstrom receive ineffective assistance of counsel?

3) Did the trial court properly weigh aggravating and mitigating factors in imposing sentence?

We affirm.

The record reveals on October 9, 1991, Nordstrom's wife, Anna, asked Nordstrom to shoot a stray cat which…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Fugate v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Burr v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Head v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Champlain v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Flynn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Saunders v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Thomas King v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API