Legal Opinion

People v. Hines

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1964No. Crim. No. 7373PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

In this capital ease, in which defendant entered a plea of guilty of murder in the first degree and in which the jury fixed the penalty at death, we reverse the judgment insofar as it relates to the penalty. The instructions and the prosecutor’s argument in the penalty trial gave rise to the errors which we condemned in People v. Morse (1964) 60 Cal.2d 631 [36 Cal.Rptr. 201, 388 P.2d 33] ; these errors, we find, were substantial. Because of the nature of the penalty trial, any substantial error, as we explain, causes prejudice. We reject, however, defendant’s contention that he suffered…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MurtishawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API