Ungar Buick Co. to Use v. Thum
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldbige, J.,
This action in replevin was brought to recover a Buick automobile.
The appellees’ contention is that on January 25, 1926, the Freeport Flint Company, owned and operated by the defendant, Thum, and one, Wall, sold and delivered to Thum a certain Buick sedan. The appellant relies on a conditional sales contract to Thum, as vendee, dated February 1, 1926, which the Tingar Buick Company executed at Miami, Florida, covering a certain new Buick automobile, having the same motor and frame numbers, and of the same model, as the car which Thum alleged he had bought from the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Riccardi Mot. Car Co. Inc. v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rockwood and Co. v. PuseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carroll v. GoddingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Gensbigler v. ShawleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Jackson v. GoodeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Gordon Gallagher v. Motors Fin. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Commonwealth v. CephasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969