Rockwood and Co. v. Pusey
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
We agree with the learned court below that set-off is not admissible as a defense in replevin: General Motors Truck Co. v. Philadelphia Paving Co., 248 Pa. 499, 503; National Cash Register Co. v. Cochran, 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 582, 586; and that an affidavit of defense in a pending suit in replevin may not be used as a petition for a declaratory judgment under the Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840. That act contemplates a distinct proceeding by petition, not the grafting of an application for a declaratory judgment on a pending action at law.
We are not satisfied, however,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Motors Truck Co. v. Philadelphia Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- National Cash Register Co. v. CochranSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Reinheimer v. HemingwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brandt v. HersheySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Ungar Buick Co. to Use v. ThumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Cinardo v. Cinardo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954