Joseph Gerdon v. Con Paulos, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission holding that a worker injured in an industrial accident had failed to prove that he was entitled to benefits for psychological care. Because the Commission’s decision was based upon its constitutional right to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of conflicting expert opinions, we affirm the order of the Commission.
*337I.
Factual Background.
On June 13, 2008, Joseph Gerdon was seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment. He was a passenger in a vehicle…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mazzone v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Cohn v. KingsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Anderson v. Harper's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Vawter v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Teffer v. Twin Falls School District No. 411Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Charles Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls and SIFIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Barr v. Citicorp Credit Service, Inc. USAIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Charles Hartgrave v. City of Twin Falls and SIFIdaho Supreme Court · 2018