Hosokawa Micron (USA) Inc. v. Duncan
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hosokawa Micron (USA), Inc. (“Hosokawa”) has moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 Fed.R. Civ.P., on the ground that it has fulfilled its contractual obligations to defendant Samuel G.N. Duncan (“Duncan”). Defendant Duncan has opposed this motion asserting that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether: (1) Hosokawa, the successor to U.S. Filter Systems Inc. (“USFS”), breached its contractual duty by refusing to provide additional funding to Sonodyne Industries, Inc. (“Sonodyne”); and (2) USFS breached its contractual duty by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Engel v. Teleprompter Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Oakridge Cablevision, Inc. v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Union County School District No. 1 v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Knox v. HansonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.