McGehee v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Russell Circuit Court. Tried before Hon. J. E. Cobb. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtBrickell, C. J.
The indictment charges that “Andrew McGehee, a freedman, unlawfully and with malice aforethought, killed Berry McMakin.” On the trial the State offered no evidence in support of the averment that the accused was' a freedman, and he requested several charges, affirming in effect that if the State had failed to prove the averment, he was entitled to a verdict of acquittal. These charges were refused and an exception reserved.
We can perceive no reason for the averment. It is wholly unnecessary, and has no legal effect. If such is the status of the accused, his offence is not thereby aggravated…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Polly v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Mose v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Joe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
3Cited by43 opinions
- Wear v. WearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Yarbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Kirby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.