Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Kellogg
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided January 13, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 67-C-9-CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and JUDGMENT
DALTON, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs, Bernard P. McDonough and his wife, bring this diversity action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332, claiming that the defendant, Marion K. Kellogg, and others wrongfully interfered with and deprived them of their right to vote, by proxies, 73,137 shares of stock in Copeland Refrigeration Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Copeland). The McDonoughs allege further that because their proxies were not permitted to vote, a proposed merger of Copeland and McDonough Company, a corporation controlled by Bernard P. McDonough, was not consummated, with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reichman v. DrakeOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
- Baruch v. Beech Aircraft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Hammonds v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965
- Leibovitz v. Central National BankOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
- Ava McClure Administratrix of the Estate of Eugene McClure Deceased v. United States Lines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Central Ohio Building & Construction Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- FARNSWORTH CANNON, INC., Appellant, v. Alton B. GRIMES, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- A & B-Abell Elevator Co. v. Columbus/Cent. Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Contadino v. TilowOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- International Union, UMWA v. Eastover Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.