Legal Opinion

Enright v. Board of Zoning Appeals

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1996No. 53A04-9503-CV-114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEZEM, Judge.

Case Summary

Petitioners-Appellants, Kevin. Enright, Nick Paikos, Cristie Spear-Paikos, Steven Hanes, Joy Shaw, Ronald Schwomeyer, Mar-illa Schwomeyer, & Protect Our Woods (collectively, “Petitioners”) appeal the trial court’s denial of their Motion to Correct Errors. We affirm.

Issue

Petitioners raise four issues on appeal, with the following issue being dispositive: whether Petitioners provided adequate notice to adverse parties with regard to their Writ of Certiorari.

Facts and Procedural History

Brown County Broadcasters, Inc. (“BCB”) submitted its application for a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams-Woodland Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Favourite v. County of Steuben Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Allen County, Indiana Board of Zoning Appeals v. GuiffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Rhoads v. Carmel Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bagnall v. Town of Beverly ShoresIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bagnall v. Town of Beverly ShoresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Town of Cedar Lake Board of Zoning Appeals v. VellegasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Bagnall v. Town of Beverly ShoresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API