Legal Opinion
Billi-Jo Cluney v. Brownells, Inc., et al.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 25, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00207Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BILLI-JO CLUNEY, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 1:24-cv-00207-SDN ) BROWNELLS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff seeks leave of Court to file an amended complaint under Rule 15(a)(2). (Motion to Amend, ECF No. 46.) Defendants Brownells, Inc. and MDX Corp. oppose the motion. (Brownells’s Opp’n, ECF No. 47; MDX’s Opp’n, ECF No. 48.) After hearing and consideration of the parties’ arguments, I recommend the Court grant the motion in part and deny the motion in part.1…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.