Legal Opinion

United States v. Leonel Salazar

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2006No. 04-50392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND OPINION

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

The ORDER published on April 10, 2006 and appearing at United States v. Salazar, 443 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2006), is hereby WITHDRAWN. The clerk shall file the attached opinion, along with Judge Rawlin-son’s concurrence.

The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel KamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Ernest James PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. John William Simpson, AKA Brother John SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  4. United States v. Marvin Jenkins, United States of America v. Ross Prock, United States of America v. Rich WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Dennis Leveque, United States of America v. John Kevin MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Estrada-EliverioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Estrada-EliverioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Leonel SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API