Legal Opinion

Millstone Corporation v. Laurel Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 21, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

A tank- belonging to the defendant which had been used for the underground storage of gasoline exploded while being steamed out by an independent contractor in the plaintiff’s building, doing the damage to the property of the plaintiff of which it complains. The pleadings raise numerous issues but the decisive one may be stated as follows: Do the subordinate facts support the conclusion that the steaming process was inherently dangerous so as to make the defendant liable for the contractor’s negligence? The facts found, necessary to determine this issue, with such correction as the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Beckwith v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  3. Norwalk Gaslight Co. v. Borough of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Lawrence v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  5. Sweet v. SweetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonczkiewicz v. Merberg Wrecking Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Trainor v. Frank Mercede & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  3. Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. LangeConnecticut Superior Court · 1954
  4. Lannan v. Child Protection Council, No. Cv 94 0049394 S (Oct. 22, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API