Weiser v. Lane
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
The verdict for the defendant was ordered rightly. The R. L. c. 102, § 10, in force when the alleged bailment was made, after designating the class of property for the loss of which the defendant as an innholder would be liable, and limiting the amount of damages recoverable, also provides, that “this section shall not affect the innholder’s liability under the provisions of any special contract for other property deposited with him for safe keeping after being fully informed of its nature and value, nor increase his liability in case of loss by fire or overwhelming force beyond that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Rubin v. HuhnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Murray v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Coe v. RickerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Rifle Ass'n v. Dayton Newspapers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Aimtek, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007