Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Kostel v. Schwartz

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2008No. 24244, 24254Published

1ConcurrenceZinter, Justice

[1197.] I concur and write on Issue 5 regarding the trial court’s partial exclusion of evidence relating to Kostel’s mental health.29 I agree with the Court’s affir-mance of the trial court’s decision to deny Dr. Schwartz’s requested use of all of Kos-tel’s mental health history. I write to explain my view of this issue, including additional factual support for our decision. I also write to explain my view of the Court’s discussion regarding the interplay of privilege on the issues.

[¶ 98.] On the issue of liability, which involves Kostel’s ability to physically heal after the surgery, I would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HeerenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mora v. Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Garbacik v. Wal-Mart Transp., LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API