Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Verizon New York, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 2019No. 1:18-cv-11628Unknown
1Opinion
USDC-SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | DOC#: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 5 ZF | | 5 JAMES H. FISCHER, Plaintiff, v. No. 18-CV-11628 (RA) VERIZON NEW YORK, INC. and OPINION & ORDER VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Defendants. RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff James Fischer, proceeding pro se, filed this action in the Supreme Court of New York, claiming that Defendants Verizon New York, Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc. repeatedly initiated prerecorded, automated phone calls to his home landline without his prior consent, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Montefiore Medical Center v. Teamsters Local 272Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Zani v. Rite Aid Headquarters Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Bais Yaakov v. Eductl. Testing ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019