Legal Opinion
Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1979No. 77-1689PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Lokey’s section 1983 action challenging termination of his minimum custody status by California prison officials is before us for the third time. The events upon which the action is based are stated in Lokey v. Richardson, 527 F.2d 949 (9th Cir. 1975). That judgment was vacated by the Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976), and Montanye v. Haymes, 427 U.S. 236, 96 S.Ct. 2543, 49 L.Ed.2d 466 (1976). Since the parties and the district court had not addressed the legal and factual issues made relevant by Meachum…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montanye v. HaymesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bob Lokey v. H. L. Richardson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Angela Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles Lloyd W. Pellman, Individually Lloyd W. Pellman, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Morrison v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commission, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Delbert Kaahanui Wakinekona v. Antone Olim, Edith M. Wilhelm, John Smythe, Winton Leong and Edwin ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official EnglishCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.