Legal Opinion

Yniguez v. Arizonans for Official English

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1995No. Nos. 92-17087, 93-15061, 93-15719PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge REINHARDT; Concurrence by Judge BRUNETTI; Special Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT; Dissent by Judge FERNANDEZ; Concurrence to Dissent by Chief Judge WALLACE; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI.

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

These consolidated appeals require us to consider an important area of constitutional law, rarely reexamined since a series of eases in the 1920s in which the Supreme Court struck down laws restricting the use of non-English languages. See Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Bartels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404, 43 S.Ct. 628, 67 L.Ed. 1047…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Maldonado v. City of Altus, OK.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Thomas D. Carver v. Jeremiah W. Nixon, Attorney General, State of Missouri John Maupin, Chair, Missouri Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API