Legal Opinion

Robert v. Holland

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1876PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Coryelle. Tried below before the Hon. J. P. Osterhout.

1Opinion of the Court

Moore, Associate Justice.

The assignment of errors in this case, are none of them sufficiently specific and definite to require any consideration from this court. But as the determination of the question sought to be presented by these assignments, is essential to the proper distribution of the estate of appellant’s intestate, it may not be amiss for us to express our views upon it, although appellants would have no just cause to complain if we declined doing so, even though there was manifest error in the rulings of the court to which the assignment of error evidently has reference.

That a…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. Guilford v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Whetstone v. CoffeyTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Routh v. RouthTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Good v. GoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API