Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 9, 1955No. 11564PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

In this habeas corpus proceeding the relator, a Pennsylvania state prisoner under sentence of death for murder, is contending that he was tried under such prejudicial circumstances and improper *506influences that it becomes the duty of a federal court to invalidate the state conviction as a denial of due process of law and to order a new trial.

The district court originally dismissed the petition without permitting relator to introduce evidence in support of his contentions. 97 F.Supp. 930. But on appeal this court ruled “that the relator must be afforded the opportunity to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Frank Delano Gay, Oliver Townsend and Willie Olen Scott v. Marcell Graham, Warden, Utah State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  2. Ronald Lee Wolfe v. Elbert v. Nash, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
  3. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Hipolito Rivera SolisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. Raymond L. Kasey v. E. R. Goodwyn, Jr., Warden, Federal Reformatory, Petersburg, VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. HandyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API