Legal Opinion

State v. Ball

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 5, 1997No. 95-3677Published

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

We reverse an order directing the state and county to pay private counsel attorney’s fees to Appellee following his acquittal on criminal charges. The trial court lacks authority to enter such an order.

Appellee claims, inter alia, that fairness requires that the state, or county, be held accountable for attorney’s fees incurred by an acquitted defendant that result from the state’s pursuit of unproved charges. Appellant reasons that the failure to reimburse non-indigent acquitted defendants for their private attorney’s fees is unconstitutional discrimination since acquitted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Trianon Park Condominium v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. United States v. KahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Glenn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API