Riverwood International Corp. v. Employers Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Chief Judge:
This appeal concerns whether an asbestos-related disease is a “bodily injury by accident” as that term is interpreted under several workers’ compensation and employers’ liability insurance policies. Because we agree that the policies are subject to only one reasonable interpretation — that an asbestos-related injury is not a “bodily injury by accident” under the policies in question — we AFFIRM the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Employers Insurance of Wausau.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff-Appellant Graphic Packaging…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Holtzclaw v. DSC Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- William King v. Jason Chide and Mark GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riverwood Intern. Corp. v. Employers Ins. of WausauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005