Legal Opinion

Sears v. . Braswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Material Facts: In the course of the trial it was admitted of record by all parties:(a) The land in controversy is the identical tract of land described in the deed from Robert D. McIlwaine and others to Wells Draughan, recorded in Book 26, page 559, Nash County registry, and described in the seventh item of the will of Wells Draughan, recorded in Will Book 9, page 277, of the clerk's office in Nash County, and is the same land as described in the deed from James W. Draughan, executor, to Richard H. Jones, recorded in Book 28, page 246, Nash registry, and in deeds from Richard H. Jones and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Davis v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Condry v. . CheshireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Fort v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Wilson v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Cauble v. . TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  3. Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Skipper v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API