Legal Opinion
State v. Panaro
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2018No. 16CA0067-MPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant Jason Panaro appeals from the judgment of the Medina Municipal Court. This Court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} On July 30, 2015, around 1 a.m., Officer Matthew Sandella of the Brunswick Hills Police Department stopped a vehicle driven by Panaro. Following the administration of field sobriety tests, Panaro was arrested and transported to the police station where breathalyzer testing was conducted. A complaint was filed, alleging that Panaro violated R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(a), R.C. 4511.19(A)(1)(h), and R.C. 4511.39.
{¶ 3} Panaro filed a motion to suppress arguing,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. ButcherOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. LederOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. LewisOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. SlimmerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. BarrettOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.