Legal Opinion

Cannon v. McNab & Eastern Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Chancery Court of Barbour and Henry, Heard b.efore Hon. B. B. MoGraw. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion,

1Opinion of the CourtB. E. Saffold, J.

The facts of this case may be stated as follows: The appellant, Thomas J. Cannon, being a dealer in cotton for speculation and profit, réceived from the Eastern Bank of Alabama, on the 21st of July, 1862, $12,359 in Confederate treasury-notes, as an advance on *100two hunderd and twenty-nine bales of cotton. He left the cotton receipts in the possession of the bank, with authority to any agent of the bank to ship the cotton to Liverpool on his risk and account. It was then to be sold, and the net proceeds were to be applied to the payment of the advance and interest upon it to the date of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hale v. Huston, Sims & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1870

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
  2. Lee v. MacOn County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Cargill & Dennis v. Kountze Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Colgate v. Compagnie Francaise du Telegraphs de Paris a New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  5. Shackelford v. BankheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API