Legal Opinion

Kerner v. Dunham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered October 20, 2006, which, in an action to recover attorneys’ fees, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, without prejudice to institution of a new action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint was properly dismissed for failure to allege that, as claimed by plaintiff in opposition to the motion, the dispute involves more than $50,000 and therefore is not covered by the Fee Dispute Resolution Program (22 NYCRR part 137; see 22 NYCRR 137.1 [b] [2]; 137.6 [b] [2]; Paikin v Tsirelman, 266 AD2d 136…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Paikin v. TsirelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wagner Davis P.C. v. GarganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Nimkoff Rosenfeld & Schechter, LLP v. O'FlahertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Messenger v. DeemNew York Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Wagner Davis P.C. v. GarganoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Zisholtz & Zisholtz, LLP v. MandelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API